| Author |
 Topic  |
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
 Posted - 10/19/2006 : 01:25:32
|
I have a Furman SPB-8 stereo pedalboard & have been experimenting with a couple different effect layout schemes. I'm fairly happy with the sounds I'm getting now but I mainly want the LS-2 to split my pedals into separate chains to minimize noise & switch between 2 main tones: driven rock & softer melodies.
At first, I had my OD-3 & TR-2 in separate chains & using the LS-2 mixing pots the TR-2 barely came through at all. After I put the OD-3 directly in front of the TR-2 in the same chain, I now get that 60s sound I've only dreamed. 
1. What recommendations might you guys have with regards to my pedal sequence? What if anything based on your experiences with BOSS pedal combinations may be a better sequence that I should try?
2. I've considered removing the TU-2 but I don't know what else I'd stick in its place. Sure I could take it out, scoot the Line Selector over a spot to the left & throw in a CS-3 Compression/Sustainer to always run in both chains but the LS-2 positioning really is key with regards to my cable lengths & having a tidy pedalboard configuration.
3. Thus far, I've taken advantage of the panning output of the DD-5 & stereo output of the BF-3 by porting them into the right channel of the pedalboard but the BF-3's stereo is so seemingly subtle, I'd much rather take advantage of the stereo output capabilities of the CE-5 Chorus or RV-5 Reverb. I think I'll run the DD-5 pan into the stereo input channel of the RV-5 then on into the pedalboard through to two amps or my mixer. Is there a better way? 
* The PH-3 comes after the BF-3 due to cable length consideration. Normally, I'd have the two reversed but I don't think it makes much difference in this case.
No, of course I DON'T have the RC-2 yet but I've already played looping games in my mind! 
 |
Edited by - DeFrag on 10/19/2006 16:26:38 |
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 10/20/2006 : 14:30:11
|
Is it too complicated an issue? Are my posts too long? Does my breath smell? Please comment on the order of my effects so that I may take advantage of a great BOSS sound & become experienced enough I can actually contribute with some credibility.
I'm now thinking about ripping out the TU-2, sticking it between my FV500-H & WD7 wah. In its place on the board, I'm thinking a standard DS-1. How do you think the DS-1 placement will fair? I think I should switch it with the OC-3 to help the OC-3 track a bit better.
umm, thanks in advance (if you dare).. & sincerely, have a nice day guys. This is a great place. Kudos to BossArea!  |
Edited by - DeFrag on 10/20/2006 14:34:10 |
 |
|
|
HAGALAZ
Silver Member
Australia
161 Posts |
Posted - 10/20/2006 : 15:40:50
|
hi
who did your graphic? I like it!!!! I would try the PH3 before the MT2, But in all honesty i dont like the PH3 as much as the PH2 but anyway give it a go, I have found that the Phaser sound is clearer pre distortion....but thats my ears 
Welcome to the forum 
|
|
|
|
FRANZONI
Double Platinum Member
Ireland
3543 Posts |
Posted - 10/21/2006 : 22:33:15
|
cool setup....i run my wah cs3,ds1,fz3,od2,ls2 and my ch1 in a row,and my ph2,bf2,tr2,dd3,dd3 in a loop of the ls2 and my tu12 off the other loop... going into a musicman 2x12 combo and a marshall superbass and 2x12....i'm playing with the idea of getting a stereo switcher and putting my ge7 on the board so if i switch to acoustic during the gig i can us my pedals through the P.A...not the overdrives ..more the delays and modulations.... |
|
|
|
FRANZONI
Double Platinum Member
Ireland
3543 Posts |
Posted - 10/21/2006 : 22:45:04
|
| sorry to go off topic ...but the leads for your pedals look to be excellent,we have trouble in ireland getting good quality leads for our pedals as most people use multi effects these days...if you don't mind me asking where did you get them...?? and do you know if they can be got on the 'net.....??i suppose at the end of the day its hard to tell someone what order to put their pedals in...its really down to what is most comfortable for you on a gig and playing wise what works for the sounds your going for in your head...it took me a long time to get all my pedals and set them up in a way that works for me.... and the thoughts of making another pedalboard to accomadate my latest idea......... |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 10/22/2006 : 03:10:12
|
Hagalaz:
I just copied & pasted into Paint Shop, scaled 'em, & ran some colored lines. Easy peasy.
Franzoni:
Their genuine Monster cables. I love 'em but I would also recommend making up your own with Switchcraft plugs especially in your case. That way you control the quality of construction. Monsters are prohibitively expensive & I think mine add to around $600 now; pretty damned steep for 20 cables. The short .75' are $25 & they go up quick. Just goto http://www.guitarcenter.com & search for "Monster Rock". |
Edited by - DeFrag on 10/22/2006 03:16:58 |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 10/22/2006 : 03:18:29
|
So I took the TU-2 out of Chain A, scooted the Octave over into its place, & stuck a new DS-1 after the Octave. DAMN the DS-1 just sounds SOOOOoooo.. similar to the Metal Zone, just a bit rougher.
I'd like to collect pedals like you guys but I also want a simple, clean, practical gigging board. WHAT CAN I STICK after my Octave & before the Metal Zone? I'm at a loss here... TIA  |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2008 : 21:58:54
|
| I'm thinking about getting a Rickenbacker guitar. Some of them have stereo outputs. |
|
|
|
4evrnewB
Silver Member
Canada
322 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2008 : 22:50:04
|
| Hey Defrag - what do the numbers over the pedals mean? |
Edited by - 4evrnewB on 01/24/2008 22:50:22 |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2008 : 23:15:57
|
| current draw |
|
|
|
Dr. Bob
Moderator
Australia
6593 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 10:15:25
|
Hi DeFrag
I was looking  at your wiring.
I think I have a headache........
I think I'll have to print it out, to get a clearer picture.
Regards Dr. Bob |
|
|
|
Dr. Bob
Moderator
Australia
6593 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 10:26:39
|
Hi Drfrag
I just took a closer look at the pics of your gear.
Where's the Mesa ?
Regards Dr. Bob |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 15:21:58
|
Old pic. I resurrected it because a stereo guitar such as a Rickenbacker seemed to fit the topic. Didn't you notice I moved the PH-3!?  |
Edited by - DeFrag on 01/25/2008 15:31:11 |
|
|
|
Dr. Bob
Moderator
Australia
6593 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 16:41:38
|
quote:
Originally posted by DeFrag
Old pic. I resurrected it because a stereo guitar such as a Rickenbacker seemed to fit the topic. Didn't you notice I moved the PH-3!?
You can't fool me DeFrag,
you even changed the setting on the BF-2 Flanger, & used a thicker, lower capacitance lead on the input.
Regards Dr. Bob |
|
|
|
4evrnewB
Silver Member
Canada
322 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 17:36:34
|
quote:
current draw
Is that something you just know, or is it measured. If measured, how is it done? |
|
|
|
DeFrag
Moderator
USA
3409 Posts |
Posted - 01/25/2008 : 18:50:25
|
| straight from the manuals |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Pedalboard Sequence & Stereo
